Ecological Footprint is essentially a measure of human consumption.
Ecological footprint analysis compares human demand on nature with the biosphere’s ability to regenerate resources and provide services. Globally the ecological footprint is larger than the earth’s biocapacity (sometimes referred to as ‘carrying capacity’) by about 50%
and this margin is growing.
Ecological Footprint measures humanity’s demand on the earth’s ecological capacity. This ecological capacity, known as biocapacity, is the area of biologically productive land and sea required to provide the resources we use and to absorb our waste. It includes all the cropland, grazing land, forest, and fishing grounds required to produce the food, fibre, and timber it consumes. It also includes the land required to absorb emissions from the energy it uses, and to provide space for its infrastructure including roads and built areas.
Put simply: environmental sustainability can only occur when the amount of productive land that people demand (ecological footprint) is equal to, or less than, the supply of productive land available (biocapacity).
According to the National Accounts for the year 2014, the total Earth’s biocapacity is estimated at 1.7 global hectares (gha) per person but humanity’s Ecological Footprint has reached 2.6gha per person. Correspondingly, the number of planets demanded by all humans has increased to 1.53 planets.
People consume resources and ecological services from all over the world, so their footprint is the sum of these areas, wherever they may be on the planet. That is why ecological footprint and biocapacity are both measured in global hectares.
Probably the best-known component of the Ecological Footprint is the Carbon Footprint. Carbon Footprint is the land required to absorb the CO2that is released from the burning of fossil fuels and other sources.
Separating the Ecological Footprint into its individual components demonstrates how each one contributes to humanity’s overall demand on the planet. Globally, the Carbon Footprint was the fastest growing component, increasing more than ninefold from 1961 to 2003.
Humanity’s footprint first grew larger than global biocapacity in the 1960s; this overshoot has been increasing every year since, with demand exceeding supply by about 50 per cent in 2014. This means that it took approximately a year and six months for the Earth to produce the ecological resources we used in that year.
How is it possible for an economy to continue operating in overshoot? Over time, the Earth builds up ecological assets, like forests and fisheries. These accumulated stocks can, for a limited period, be harvested faster than they regenerate. CO2 can also be emitted into the atmosphere faster than it is removed, accumulating over time.
For more than four decades we have been in overshoot, drawing down these assets and increasing the amount of CO2 in the air. We cannot remain in overshoot much longer without depleting the planet’s biological resources and interfering with its long-term ability to renew them.
New Zealand’s Ecological Footprint
New Zealand’s ecological footprint in 2012 was 4.31gha per capita which ranked us 36th highest in the world.
However because of our sparse population and relative abundance of productive land New Zealand has not overshot it’s national biocapacity.
Our total biocapacity in 2012 was 10.19gha so New Zealand has a biological reserve of 5.88gha.
Go here to find different calculators that will calculate your ecological footprint